In partnership with

The Free Newsletter Fintech and Finance Execs Actually Read

If you work in fintech or finance, you already have too many tabs open and not enough time.

Fintech Takes is the free newsletter senior leaders actually read. Each week, I break down the trends, deals, and regulatory moves shaping the industry — and explain why they matter — in plain English.

No filler, no PR spin, and no “insights” you already saw on LinkedIn eight times this week. Just clear analysis and the occasional bad joke to make it go down easier.

Get context you can actually use. Subscribe free and see what’s coming before everyone else.

Let me tell you about the week I stopped chasing clients.

I was three years into running my own operation, doing what most entrepreneurs do: grinding through referrals, showing up at networking events with a pocket full of business cards, and refreshing my inbox like it owed me money. Revenue was fine. Not spectacular, but fine. The pipeline though? It looked like a drought map. Feast one month, famine the next, and absolutely no visibility into where the next client was coming from.

I had read all the books. I had taken the courses. I knew the theory of lead generation. What I did not have was a system. I had a collection of tactics that I deployed inconsistently based on whatever felt most urgent at any given moment, which is the business equivalent of trying to fill a bathtub with the drain open.

Then I sat down one Sunday and actually mapped out how my best clients had found me. Not the average ones. Not the difficult ones. The genuinely great clients. The ones who paid on time without being asked, who respected my process, who sent referrals without being prompted, and who made the work feel worthwhile.

Every single one had come through a system. A piece of content I had written six months earlier. An automated follow-up sequence that I had built once and forgotten about. A lead magnet that pre-qualified them before they ever got on a call with me. Not a handshake at a conference. Not a cold DM. A repeatable, scalable process that ran with or without my direct involvement.

That Sunday afternoon was the day I stopped being a salesperson and started being an architect. Here is what I built, and more importantly, here is how you can build the same thing.

The Three-Layer Acquisition Stack

Most business owners think about client acquisition in terms of tactics. Post more on LinkedIn. Run some ads. Cold email a list. These are not strategies. They are activities. And activities without architecture are just expensive hobbies with a marketing budget attached.

The system I use runs on three distinct layers, and each one feeds into the next. Pull any one of them out and the whole thing stops working. Keep all three running and the pipeline fills itself.

Layer 1 is Attraction. This is your content, your presence, your authority signal. The job of this layer is not to sell anything. The job is purely to establish credibility and pull in people who already have the problem you solve. Think of it as a fishing net rather than a fishing pole. You are not hunting one prospect at a time. You are creating an environment where the right people swim toward you.

For this layer, I run a weekly newsletter, two short-form LinkedIn posts per week, and one long-form guide published to my website every month. That is it. No TikTok. No Twitter threads. No podcast. Just consistent, useful content in the channels where my specific audience actually lives and makes decisions. The consistency is more important than the volume. Showing up every week for two years beats a viral post every six months by an enormous margin.

Layer 2 is Capture. Once someone reads your content and thinks, okay, this person understands my problem, they need somewhere to go. This is where most people blow it entirely. They send traffic to a generic homepage with no clear next step, or they tell people to follow them on Instagram, or they end every piece of content with a vague call to action that amounts to reaching out if you want to work together. None of those work because none of them offer a compelling reason to take action right now.

My capture layer is built around a single lead magnet: a detailed framework document that solves one specific, immediate problem my target audience faces. Anyone who downloads it gets added to my email list automatically. From there, they enter a five-email onboarding sequence that runs without any manual involvement from me. By the time they finish that sequence, which takes about ten days, they know exactly who I am, what I do, who I serve best, and what the next step looks like if they want help. The sequence does the qualifying work before they ever reach me.

Layer 3 is Conversion. This is where qualified prospects turn into paying clients. But here is the word that matters: qualified. If your attraction and capture layers are doing their jobs correctly, the people who reach out to you are already 80 percent sold. They are not tire-kickers doing comparison shopping. They are buyers who need logistics. The conversation is entirely different when someone comes in pre-qualified versus when they are cold.

My conversion layer is a simple application form, a 45-minute strategy call, and an automated follow-up sequence that handles objections without any manual chasing from me. The follow-up runs for 14 days after the call and then stops. If someone has not moved forward after 14 days of follow-up, they are not ready. I do not chase past that point. The system moves on and so do I.

The Automation Backbone

None of this works without the right tools stitching it together and talking to each other. Over the past two years I have tested a significant number of platforms, and what I keep coming back to is Make.com for automation and Go High Level for CRM and pipeline management. Together, they handle roughly 90 percent of the operational work in my acquisition system without requiring my daily attention.

Here is a practical breakdown of how the automation actually flows in real time.

When someone downloads my lead magnet, a Make.com scenario fires immediately. It adds them to my email list, tags them based on which specific magnet they downloaded, kicks off the appropriate welcome sequence in Go High Level, and logs the new contact in my CRM with the full context of how they found me. That last piece matters: knowing where leads come from lets me track which content is generating the best prospects, not just the most prospects.

When someone clicks a specific link in email three of the sequence, which is the detailed case study, they get automatically tagged as high-intent and a task gets created in my CRM to prompt a personal outreach if the sequence does not convert them on its own. This is the one point where automation hands off to human judgment, and the trigger is behavioral rather than arbitrary.

When someone fills out my application form, Make.com parses the responses and scores the lead based on a set of criteria I defined: business size, urgency level, budget range, and fit with my specific expertise. High-score leads get a calendar scheduling link sent to them within 15 minutes of submission. Lower-score leads enter a nurture sequence that runs for 30 days, re-engaging with value-focused content, before a final re-engagement check at the end.

I spent about eight hours building this system the first time. Now it runs without me touching it week to week. That initial eight hours has compounded into hundreds of hours saved and a pipeline that is visible, measurable, and predictable in a way that cold prospecting never was.

The goal is not to automate everything. The goal is to automate the repeatable parts so your energy goes toward the irreplaceable parts: your judgment, your relationships, your expertise.

What Your Content Actually Has to Do

Here is where a lot of smart people get stuck. They understand the architecture in theory. But their content does not do the specific job each layer requires, so the whole system underperforms.

The most common failure mode is content that is interesting without being useful, or useful without being interesting. You need both. Interesting without being useful entertains people and generates likes. Useful without interest gets bookmarked and never read. Neither builds a pipeline.

At the top of the funnel, your content has one job: create identification. The reader should finish it thinking, this person is describing my exact problem. Not a general version of it. The specific version that keeps them up at three in the morning. That requires you to know your audience at a granular level. Not entrepreneurs. Not small business owners. Founders of service businesses doing between $500,000 and $2 million in annual revenue who are stuck at a revenue ceiling and cannot diagnose why their best efforts are not translating into consistent growth.

At the middle of the funnel, your content needs to build credibility through specificity. Case studies with real numbers. Frameworks that show how you think through problems. Honest caveats about where approaches fail and why. Nobody buys from someone who claims everything works perfectly. They buy from someone who can look them in the eye and say here is exactly where this breaks down, here is why, and here is how you navigate around it.

At the bottom of the funnel, your content needs to create urgency without manufacturing it artificially. Fake scarcity insults intelligent readers. Real urgency comes from articulating the cost of inaction. What is it costing them right now to stay in their current situation? How long have they already been living with this problem? What does the next twelve months look like if nothing changes?

Get those three things right and your content does the selling before any selling conversation ever happens.

The Numbers Behind a Functioning Pipeline

Let me give you some concrete benchmarks so you know what working actually looks like in practice.

For my business, a healthy month looks like this: 3,000 to 5,000 new newsletter subscribers from a combination of organic content and targeted paid promotion. A 35 to 45 percent open rate on the welcome sequence, which is significantly above industry average and reflects how well the lead magnet qualifies people upfront. A 4 to 6 percent application conversion rate from subscribers who have completed the full onboarding sequence. Eight to twelve strategy call applications per month. Four to six actual calls. Two to three new clients.

That is a system generating roughly $25,000 to $40,000 in new monthly revenue from a process that runs mostly without my daily involvement. The content creation is the one piece that still requires my time, and even that is templated enough that it takes me four to six hours per week.

Your numbers will be different based on your price point, your market, and how well-defined your audience is. But the ratios tend to hold. If your application rate is under 2 percent of subscribers who completed the sequence, your sequence is not qualifying hard enough or creating enough urgency. If your call-to-close rate is under 30 percent, the calls themselves are still doing too much selling. Diagnose the bottleneck before you pour more traffic into the top.

Your First 30 Days

If you are starting from zero or rebuilding from scratch, here is a realistic 30-day implementation plan.

  1. Week 1: Define your audience with uncomfortable specificity. One sentence, one person, one urgent problem. If you can describe a dozen different people as your target audience, you do not have an audience. You have a guess.

  2. Week 2: Create your lead magnet. One specific piece of content that solves one immediate problem your audience faces. A detailed framework document works well. A comprehensive checklist works. Do not overthink the format.

  3. Week 3: Build your landing page, set up your email list, and write your five-email welcome sequence. You need a focused page with a single call to action and a form that captures email in exchange for the lead magnet.

  4. Week 4: Set up your automation using Make.com. Connect your landing page to your email platform, build your lead scoring logic, and create your application routing workflow. Then publish content every single day for the rest of the month.

At the end of 30 days you will have a functioning acquisition system. It will not be perfect. It will need iteration. But it will be working, and working systems compound in ways that perfect plans never do.

If you want the exact Make.com blueprint I use to run this entire sequence, including the lead scoring logic and the follow-up automation, reply to this email with the word ACQUIRE and I will send it directly to your inbox.

Wealth is a system, not a guess.

Dan Kaufman

Wealth Architect at The Wealth Grid

Tools referenced in this issue:

Beehiiv (newsletter platform): https://www.beehiiv.com?via=Dan-Kaufman

Recommended for you