Stop Drowning In AI Information Overload
Your inbox is flooded with newsletters. Your feed is chaos. Somewhere in that noise are the insights that could transform your work—but who has time to find them?
The Deep View solves this. We read everything, analyze what matters, and deliver only the intelligence you need. No duplicate stories, no filler content, no wasted time. Just the essential AI developments that impact your industry, explained clearly and concisely.
Replace hours of scattered reading with five focused minutes. While others scramble to keep up, you'll stay ahead of developments that matter. 600,000+ professionals at top companies have already made this switch.
There's a deal sitting in your pipeline right now that you've mentally written off.
You sent a solid proposal. The prospect was engaged in the conversation. Then they went quiet. You followed up once, maybe twice. Silence. You told yourself they weren't serious, or the timing was wrong, or they probably went with someone else. You moved on because you had real work to do and chasing people who aren't responding is exhausting in a specific way that's hard to explain to anyone who hasn't done it.
Here's the number that should bother you: research across B2B sales cycles consistently shows that 80 percent of deals close between the fifth and twelfth follow-up. Most salespeople quit after two. Most business owners, who are also the salesperson, quit after one.
This isn't a character flaw. It's a resource problem. Following up six to twelve times on every proposal, in a way that feels thoughtful rather than desperate, requires time and attention you don't have. So the follow-up stops, the deal dies quietly, and you never know whether they would have said yes on contact number five.
The fix is not a motivational speech about persistence. The fix is a system that does the follow-up for you, with better timing and better messaging than you'd produce in the moment, without requiring any ongoing attention from you once it's built.
That's what we're building today.
Why Manual Follow-Up Breaks Down
There are three distinct failure modes in manual follow-up, and most owners experience all three simultaneously.
The first is the memory problem. You have 15 open proposals at any given moment. Remembering which ones need a touch and when requires either a good system or an uncomfortably large portion of your working memory. Most people have neither, so follow-up happens when they happen to think of it, which is inconsistent by definition.
The second is the discomfort problem. Following up on a proposal you care about closing feels vulnerable. You're putting yourself back in front of someone who already didn't respond to you. The natural impulse is to wait until you feel confident they'll reply, which is a moment that never arrives. So you delay, and delay, and then so much time has passed that reaching out feels awkward for different reasons.
The third is the quality problem. When you do finally follow up, you're usually doing it reactively, while managing three other things, without any real thought about what this specific person needs to hear at this specific point in their decision process. You write something generic. They don't reply. You conclude they're not interested, when in reality you just sent the wrong message at the wrong time.
Automated follow-up solves all three. The timing is exact because it's programmatic. The discomfort disappears because you're not the one doing it. The quality is high because you wrote the messages deliberately, when you were thinking clearly, not in the margins of a busy afternoon.
The Five-Touch Sequence Architecture
Here's the exact sequence I use for every proposal that doesn't receive an immediate response. Each message has a specific psychological job. None of them feel pushy if you write them right. The goal of each touch is not to close the deal. The goal is to earn the next reply.
Touch 1: Day 3 After Proposal (The Value-Add)
Subject line: One thing I forgot to mention.
This is not a check-in. The phrase 'just checking in' should be retired permanently. It communicates nothing except that you want something from them. Touch 1 adds one genuine piece of value you either forgot to include in the proposal or didn't have at the time of sending. A case study that's directly relevant to their situation. A data point that supports the ROI you projected. A tool or resource they'd find useful whether or not they hire you.
Length: five to seven sentences. Close with a soft open: 'Happy to answer any questions if anything came up when you reviewed the proposal.' No call booking link. No urgency language. Just useful.
Why this works: it reframes the follow-up as service rather than pursuit. You're not checking up on a proposal. You're adding to the value they already received.
Touch 2: Day 7 (The Objection Anticipator)
By day seven, silence almost always means one of two things: they're busy and the proposal has slid down the priority list, or they have a question or concern they haven't voiced. Your job in this message is to name the most common unvoiced objection and address it before they have to ask.
Something in this structure: 'Most of the people I work with have a moment where they wonder whether the timing is actually right to take this on, especially when things are already busy. It's a fair question. Here's how we've typically handled that...' Then give a one-paragraph, specific answer.
This message does something subtler than it appears. It shows you understand their world, not just your service offering. It demonstrates that you've been in this conversation before and know where the friction usually lives. That's a form of credibility that a polished proposal deck can't manufacture.
Touch 3: Day 14 (The Social Proof Drop)
Two weeks in, the prospect needs evidence that other people made the decision they're considering and that it worked out. Not a generic testimonial. A brief, specific story with real context.
Structure: a client in a similar situation, the problem they were dealing with that looked a lot like what you described, and what the first 60 days looked like after they started. Keep it under 150 words. Use real numbers where you have them. End with a genuine question: 'Worth a 20-minute call to see if the same applies to your situation?'
Specificity is what makes this message work. 'Our clients see great results' is invisible. 'A service firm with 12 employees reduced their proposal-to-close time from 34 days to 18 days in the first 8 weeks' is something a prospect can place themselves inside.
Touch 4: Day 21 (The Decision Framer)
Three weeks after the proposal, the conversation needs a reset without making either party feel awkward about the elapsed time. This message acknowledges directly that time has passed and removes the friction from re-engaging.
Something like: 'It's been a few weeks since I sent the proposal. I know there are always competing priorities and decisions take the time they take. I want to make sure the door stays open if and when the timing works for you.' Then offer a specific, low-commitment next step: a revised scope, a brief call to answer any remaining questions, or the option to pause and revisit in 60 days.
You're doing two things here. You're removing any embarrassment they might feel about going quiet. And you're making the decision to re-engage feel easy rather than like they owe you an explanation.
Touch 5: Day 35 (The Clean Break)
This is the most underrated message in the entire sequence and it generates more responses than any of the previous four. It's the breakup email, and it works because of a simple psychological principle: people don't want to be the one who closed the door.
Something direct and clean: 'I don't want to keep taking up space in your inbox if the timing genuinely isn't right. I'm going to close out your file on my end this week unless I hear otherwise. If your situation changes down the road, I'm easy to find.'
This message creates a real deadline, not an artificial one. And it treats the prospect like an adult with competing priorities rather than a prospect who owes you a decision. Roughly 20 to 30 percent of the people who receive this message respond. Some of them sign within the week.
Building the Sequence in Make.com
Here's the technical build. This runs entirely automatically once the trigger fires. The only thing you do manually is respond when someone replies.
Step 1: Create a Proposal Sent status in your CRM. Every time you send a proposal, tagging it with this status is the trigger that starts the sequence. Make this a habit you cannot skip.
Step 2: Build a Make.com scenario triggered by the Proposal Sent status. The scenario schedules five outgoing messages with the delays baked in. Day 3, 7, 14, 21, and 35 from the trigger date.
Step 3: Store your five message templates in a Notion database or directly in your CRM. The Make.com scenario pulls the right template and inserts the personalization variables automatically: prospect name, company name, the service they were quoted, and the proposal date.
Step 4: Add a conditional check before each scheduled send. If the deal status has changed to Won, Closed Lost, or Meeting Scheduled since the last touch, cancel the remaining sequence. The last thing you want is to send a breakup email to someone who signed a contract three weeks ago.
Step 5: Route any reply to an immediate Slack notification or an email alert flagged as high priority. Reply speed is part of the close. When a prospect finally re-engages after weeks of silence, responding within the hour is a competitive advantage most people don't capitalize on.
Build this at Make.com. If you already have your CRM connected to Make, this scenario takes about two hours to build and test. If you're starting from scratch, budget a full day for the initial setup.
Tracking What the Sequence Is Actually Doing
Once the sequence is live, track four metrics on a monthly basis. This tells you where the sequence is working and where it needs adjustment.
Open rate by touch: Which messages are being read? If Touch 2 open rates are low, the subject line needs rework. If Touch 4 is consistently outperforming Touch 1, your Day 3 message is probably not compelling enough.
Reply rate by touch: Where in the sequence are prospects actually responding? This identifies which message is landing as the real conversation starter. Most sequences I've analyzed generate the most replies from Touch 1 and Touch 5, with a secondary cluster around Touch 3.
Time from first touch to close: Are proposals converting faster since you implemented the sequence? Track the average number of days from proposal sent to contract signed before and after. This metric should improve within 60 days.
Revival rate: What percentage of deals you had written off came back through the sequence? Track this separately. Even a 15 percent revival rate on proposals you'd already mentally closed represents meaningful additional revenue from work you'd already done.
A Tool Worth Adding: Rize.io
Before you implement this system, take one week and track how much time you currently spend on manual follow-up activities: writing one-off emails, checking whether you followed up with someone, searching for old proposal threads, trying to remember where a conversation left off. Most owners are spending four to six hours a week on this, often without realizing it.
Run that number after the sequence has been live for 30 days. The comparison is striking. That recovered time goes directly back into work that generates new revenue instead of chasing revenue that may or may not materialize.
Track your time with Rize.io. It runs in the background and categorizes your time automatically. Seeing the actual data is more motivating than any productivity framework.
Get the Full System: FOLLOWUP
I've packaged the complete five-touch sequence with all templates written and ready to customize, the Make.com scenario blueprint with all conditional logic pre-mapped, the CRM tagging structure, and a 20-minute walkthrough video showing exactly how to connect all the pieces. Most people are live within a day of downloading it.
Reply FOLLOWUP to get the full system.
The deal you've already written off is probably still winnable. You just need a system that's more patient than you are.
Alex Rivera
Wealth Architect, The Wealth Grid
"Wealth is a system, not a guess."